Issue: №11/1, 2019
Doi: https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2019.11(1).7
Introduction. In the theory of expertise there is no comprehensive concept of evaluating the effectiveness of court-expert activity in general and the work of a court expert in particular, the corresponding conceptual apparatus of "court-expert efficiency" has not been fully developed and systematized, theoretical and normative criteria and indicators to assess its effectiveness have not been formed. This made it an expedient to conduct a study aimed at determining the criteria and indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of court expertise. The purpose of the work is to theoretically justify and develop methodological recommendations related to the formation of a system of criteria and indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of court-expert activity. Results. The article is devoted to the exploration of theoretical and methodological approaches to the evaluation of the effecti-veness of the court-expert scientific research institutes (institutions). Criteria have been defined and indicators of effectiveness of court-expert activity have been grouped that related to organizational-managerial, scientific-methodological and informational support, execution of a court experts expertise and providing an conclusion, with selection and training of court- experts. Conclusion. The use of a complex integral indicator to evaluate the effectiveness of court-expert activity and to identify the impact of each direction of activity of research institutes (institutions) of court expertise on the effectiveness as a whole is substantiated.
Keywords : court-expert activity, efficiency, effectiveness, quality, efficiency
References:
1. Register of court-experts. Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. URL: http://rase.minjust.gov.ua. (in Ukrainian).
2. Information on court-experts who are not employees of specialized state institutions for 2018. Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. URL: https://minjust.gov.ua/m/informatsiya-schodo-sudovih-ekspertiv-yaki-ne-e-pratsivnikami-derjavnih-spetsializovanih-ustanov-za-2018-rik-stanom-na-01042019. (in Ukrainian).
3. Kofanov A.V. Some aspects of the preparation of forensic experts, their interaction with management and the evaluation of their research. Forensic Bulletin. Kyiv. 2013. №. 2 (20). P.107-115. (in Ukrainian).
4. Orlov Yu.K. Expert opinion and assessment (in criminal matters): tutorial. Moscow: Lawyer, 1995. 64 p. (in Russian).
5. Shcherbakovskyi M.H. Some questions assess the expert's opinion. Law Journal of Donetsk University. 2002. № 1 (7).
pp. 57-61. (in Ukrainian).
6. Kravchuk T.O. Evaluation of expert opinion and its probative value in the administrative proceedings of Ukraine. Innovative solutions in today's economy. 2016. № 6 (6). pp. 1-13. (in Ukrainian).
7. Klymchuk M.P. The informational value of an expert's opinion as a source of evidence in a criminal case. Legal Informatics. 2011. №. 3-4 (31). pp. 81-88. (in Ukrainian).
8. Klymenko N.I. Expert opinion as a source of evidence in the proceedings. Expert support for the investigation of certain types of crimes: materials of scientific-practice. conf. (Kyiv, March 31, 2011). Kyiv, 2001. pp. 73-76. (in Ukrainian).
9. The Great Interpretive Dictionary of Modern Ukrainian / ed. V.T. Busel. Kyiv: VTF "Perun", 2007. 1736 p. (in Ukrainian).
10. Habor S.S. Efficiency as an economic category. Innovative economy. Ternopil. 2012. № 7. pp. 14–17. (in Ukrainian).
11. Cherep A.V., Strilets Y.M. Efficiency as an economic category. An efficient economy. 2013. № 1. URL: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op1&z=1727 (in Ukrainian).
12. Mochernyy S.V. Fundamentals of economic knowledge. Kyiv: Academy, 2000. 303 р. (in Ukrainian).
13. Samoshchenko N.S. On the concept of the effectiveness of legal sciences. Scientists notes. Moscow: VNYYSZ, 1969.
pp. 19-24. (in Russian).
14. Mykhailenko O., Pasechko Z. On the role of the prosecutor's office in improving the effectiveness of coordination of activities in the fight against crime. Procurator's Bulletin. Kyiv. 2008. № 5 (83). pp. 37-44. (in Ukrainian).
15. Samoshchenko Y.S., Nikitinskiy V.Y. Some problems of the methodology of studying the effectiveness of legal norms. Problems of the sociology of law. Vil'nyus, 1970. Issue 1. pp. 34-45. (in Russian).
16. Pavlenko Y.H. Approaches to the definition of the economic essence of the concept of “efficiency”. Economics and Management. 2006. № 1. pp. 35–38. (in Russian).
17. Ryabkova O.V. The essence of the effectiveness and efficiency of the enterprise. URL: http://mevhnu.com/load/2013/ 7_konkurentnij_potencial_pidpriemstva_metodi_ta_mekha-nizmi_pidvishhennja/37-1-0-246. (in Ukrainian).
18. Smetanyuk O.A. Etymology of the category "organizational management effectiveness". Current problems of the economy. 2009. № 8. pp. 136-140. (in Ukrainian).
19. DSTU ISO 9000: 2007. Quality management systems. Basic terms and glossary. URL: https://dbn.at.ua_ld/11/ 1128_432_iso9000-1-.pdf. (in Ukrainian).
20. Herasymenko I.M. Estimation of efficiency of enterprise management system in the context of organizational development Problems of systematic approach in economy. 2011. № 4. URL: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/ejournals/PSPE/2011_4/Gerasimenko_411.htm. (in Ukrainian).
21. Khodykina I.V. Approaches to assessing the effectiveness of HRM. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Economy series. 2015. Vol. 2 (4). Part 2. pp. 115-120. (in Ukrainian).
22. Kasych A.O., Ilyushchenko B.M. Indicators and quality criteria of the research institution. URL: https://er.knutd.edu.ua/ bitstream/123456789/2992/1/20161115_502.pdf. (in Ukrainian).
23. Methods of evaluation of the effectiveness of research work / V.A. Karpov, T.S. Korolova, A.Z. Pidhornyi. Odesa: ODEU. Rotaprint, 2005. 19 p. (in Ukrainian).
24. Kostin O.Y., Khomutenko V.P., Khomutenko A.V. Some aspects of the staffing of the Institute of Forensic Experts. Economics. Finances. Law. 2019. № 7. pp. 26-32. (in Ukrainian).
25. Khomutenko V.P. Theoretical approaches to assessing the effectiveness of judicial economic expertise. Scientific and practical publication. Visnyk ONDISE. № 5, 2019. pp. 346-349. (in Ukrainian)