Issue: №11/2, 2019
Doi: https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2019.11(2).8
It is argued that the system of programming of economic-analytical resultant general and intermediate indicators and quality qualitative criteria should be created as a general for all functionally developed system of strategic management of special purpose by scientific-industrial association and enterprise of industry, it should be chosen in accordance with the characteristics of the researched in the process studied. Analytical processing of technical and economic information data of their set, level of development of technical means and requirements that presented to the coding system. The basic requirements are: ensuring the identification of all positions without exception, availability of code reserves, ease of access and ease of remembering by the person, the ability to use the means of functional development of computing work when using the classifier. The valid, currently used in practice code of the individual resultant general and intermediate indicators and quality qualitative criteria used in the analytical subsystem of technical and economic information contains seven characters, the first of which – the letter – denotes a group of objects of integrated economic analysis and assesses and meets the qualification and quality criteria set out in the classification system for the groups of resultant general and intermediate indicators. The next two characters are digital, they are intended to identify objects of the analytical subsystem of technical and economic information data that are, in general, identical to the objects of the production process. The fourth letter character of the code characterizes the levels of strategic management system, which include the industrial enterprise, type of production process, shop, site etc. The fifth letter defines the function of the strategic management system, in the process of implementation of which one or another resultant general and intermediate index and criterion of quality qualimetry are formed. It is proved that the last two numerical symbols are the ordinal number of the resultant general and intermediate index, the criterion of qualitative character of economics efficiency in a specific group.
Keywords : analysis, coding, criterion, economic productivity, feasibility, function, general, index, intermediate, qualimetry, quality, resultant, system, target
References:
1. Berezhnaya E.V., Kiseleva O.A. The development of regional socio-economic systems: analysis, evaluation and forecasting of: a monograph. Stavropol: Higher Educational Institution "North Caucasian State Technical University", 2010. 186 p. (in Russian).
2. Gabdullina G.K. Development of a methodology for economic analysis and assessment of the functioning of corporate structures in a region: a monograph. Novosibirsk: CRNS, 2017.112 p. (in Russian).
3. Korchagina E.V. Analysis and assessment of economic sustainability in business structures. Saint Petersburg: Higher Educational Institution "Saint-Petersburg State University of Finance and Economics", 2002. 145 p. (in Russian).
4. Novoselova I.Yu. Economic assessment and analysis of the region’s natural resource potential: a monograph. Moscow: Higher Educational Institution "State University of Management", 2009. 144 p. (in Russian).
5. Ozerov E.S. Economic analysis and evaluation of real estate. Saint Petersburg: ISS, 2007. 535 p. (in Russian).
6. Plaskova N.S. Strategic economic analysis and performance evaluation of commercial organizations: diss. ... Doctor of Economic Sciences: 08.00.12 / Higher Educational Institution "Russian State University of Trade and Economics". Moscow, 2008. 453 p. (in Russian).
7. Soloveva I.A. Economic analysis and assessment of investment processes in industrial enterprises: a monograph. Chelyabinsk: Higher Educational Institution "South Ural State University", 2009. 103 p. (in Russian).
8. Fedorov V.N. Socio-economic potential of the infrastructure: the content, assessment and analysis of the development. Ulyanovsk: Higher Educational Institution "Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University", 2000. 195 p. (in Russian).
9. Yakovlev A.P., Shishkin V.I. Functional and economic analysis in the rationalization and evaluation of innovations: a monograph. Cheboksary: Chuvash Book Publishing House, 1998.157 p. (in Russian).