Issue: № 7, 2024
Doi: https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2024.7.20
The paper examines the application of Article 14 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which prohibits discrimination. The author highlights the absence of a clear definition of "discrimination" in the text of the Convention, which complicates its interpretation. Examples from case law, such as the "Belgian Linguistic case" and "Sidabras and Džiautas v. Lithuania", illustrate different approaches to interpretation of the concept of discrimination. The following forms of discrimination are discussed: direct, indirect, discrimination by association, and positive actions. The necessity of considering the specific circumstances of individual cases for objective and reasonable court decision to be made is emphasized. The paper describes how the European Court of Human Rights protects the rights of individuals affected by discriminatory measures or actions, particularly in the context of education, employment, religion, etc. For instance, in the "Belgian Linguistic case," the Court preferred the English version of the Convention's wording, warning against a literal interpretation of the French version that could lead to excessive prohibition of any differentiation. Additionally, the "D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic" case illustrates the Court's approach to indirect discrimination and the importance of assessing the impact of state measures on specific groups. Positive measures, such as those highlighted in "Horváth and Kiss v. Hungary," demonstrate the Court's stance on the state's obligation to address systemic issues and provide effective protection against discrimination. The analysis underscores the broad scope of Article 14 and the role of the European Court of Human Rights in ensuring non-discrimination across various spheres.
Keywords : discrimination, court practice, ECHR, direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, discrimination by association, positive actions
References:
1. The European Convention on Human Rights dated November 04, 1950. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text (in Ukrainian).
2. Pankevych O. Z. Protection of human right for non-discrimination in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Scientific Bulletin of the Lviv State University of Internal Affairs. 2016. №3. pp. 325-335. URL: https://dspace.lvduvs.edu.ua/bitstream/1234567890/1752/1/Панкевич.pdf (in Ukrainian).
3. Case “relating to certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium” v. Belgium (merits) (Application no 1474/62; 1677/62; 1691/62; 1769/63; 1994/63; 2126/64): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 23 July 1968. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57525
4. Gerards J. The Discrimination Grounds of Article14 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 2013. Volume 13, Issue 1. pp. 99–124. URL: https://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/r30700.pdf
5. Case of Sidabras and Džiautas v. Lithuania (Applications nos. 55480/00 and 59330/00): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 27 July 2004. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61942
6. Case of Rasmussen v. Denmark (Application no. 8777/79): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 28 November 1984. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57563
7. Registry of the European Court of Human Rights. Guide on Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights and on Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 to the Convention. 29.02.2024. URL: https://ks.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr-ks/guide_art_14_art_1_protocol_12_eng
8. Case of Alexandru Enache v. Romania (Application no. 16986/12): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 3 October 2017. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-177677
9. Case of Biao v. Denmark (Application no. 38590/10): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 24 May 2016. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163115
10. Case of D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic (Application no. 57325/00): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 13 November 2007. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83256
11. Case of Opuz v. Turkey (Application no. 33401/02): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 9 June 2009. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-92945
12. Case of Guberina v. Croatia (Application no. 23682/13): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 22 March 2016. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161530
13. Case of Molla Sali v. Greece (Application no. 20452/14): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 19 December 2018. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-188985
14. Case of Thlimmenos v. Greece (Application no. 34369/97): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 6 April 2000. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58561
15. Case of Horváth and Kiss v. Hungary (Application no. 11146/11): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 29 January 2013. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-116124