Випуск: № 12, 2022
Doi: https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2022.12.6
Зазначено, що для встановлення змісту права на захист необхідно дослідити інтерпретацію права на захист у практиці національних судів. Визначено перелік основних обставин, які розглядались ЄСПЛ в рішеннях проти України у контексті порушення права на захист. Наголошено на невичерпності обставин, які можуть становити порушення права на захист, які є результатом судового розсуду; судовий розсуд стосується повноважень судді приймати рішення на основі своєї індивідуальної оцінки, керуючись принципами справедливості та закону. Визначено, що наслідки суддівського розсуду визначаються його відповідністю вимогам закону, мотивованості, справедливості та об’єктивності.
Ключові слова : право на захист, практика національних судів, міжнародні судові установи, юрисдикція, правосуддя, судовий розсуд, рішення ЄСПЛ
References:
1. Petryshyn O. Judicial practice as a source of law in Ukraine: problems of theory. Law of Ukraine. 2016. No. 10. pp. 20-28 (in Ukrainian).
2. Resolution of the Supreme Court of Appeals of Ukraine dated March 1, 2018 in case No. 760/13866/15-k. URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/72642008 (in Ukrainian).
3. Resolution of the CCS of the Supreme Court of October 23, 2018 in case No. 158/2313/15-k. URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/77393408 (in Ukrainian).
4. Resolution of the CC of the Supreme Court of June 19. 2018 in case No. 444/430/16-k. URL: www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/74963597 (in Ukrainian).
5. Resolution of the Supreme Court of Appeals of Ukraine dated March 19, 2019 in case No. 592/9692/17 (proceedings No. 51-5358km18). URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80681497 (in Ukrainian).
6. Resolution of the CCS of the Supreme Court dated 13.12.2018 in case No. 1-34/03. URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/78750763 (in Ukrainian).
7. Resolution of the CCS of the Supreme Court dated March 19, 2019 in case No. 1-59/2010 (proceedings No. 51-5562km18). URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80716249 (in Ukrainian).
8. resolution of the Supreme Court of Justice dated June 27, 2018 in case No. 203/133/17 URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/75149563 (in Ukrainian).
9. Resolution of the CCS of the Supreme Court of January 31, 2019 in case No. 489/2741/17 URL: www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/79616457 (in Ukrainian).
10. Resolution of the Supreme Court of Appeals of Ukraine dated March 12, 2019 in case No. 127/2548/17. URL: www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80521833 (in Ukrainian).
11. Resolution of the CCS of the Supreme Court dated March 14, 2019 in case No. 223/452/17 URL: www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/805558294 (in Ukrainian).
12. Resolution of the CCS of the Supreme Court dated March 20, 2019 in case No. 748/350/16-k (proceedings No. 51-5429км18). URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80681503 (in Ukrainian).
13. Resolution of the Supreme Court of Appeals of Ukraine dated November 22, 2018 in case No. 367/2029/17 (proceedings No. 51-3214км18). URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/78129794 (in Ukrainian).
14. Resolution of the CCS of the Supreme Court dated September 25, 2018 in case No. 444/2348/16-k. URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/76812102 (in Ukrainian).
15. Resolution of the Supreme Court of Appeals Committee dated May 15, 2018 in case No. 698/677/15-k. URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/74121048 (in Ukrainian).
16. Resolution of the CCS of the Supreme Court dated January 31, 2019 in case No. 186/1252/17. URL: www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/79684816 (in Ukrainian).
17. Decision of the Supreme Court dated January 10, 2019 in case No. 656/234/17. URL: www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/79173863 (in Ukrainian).
18. Resolution of the Supreme Court of Appeals of Ukraine dated April 10, 2019 in case No. 444/797/18. URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/81234917 (in Ukrainian).
19. Resolution of the CCS of the Supreme Court of 21.03. 2019 in case No. 353/627/17. URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80751587 (in Ukrainian).
20. Resolution of the CC of the Supreme Court of February 13, 2018 in case No. 425/915/16-k. URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/72243746 (in Ukrainian).
21. Resolution dated March 13, 2018 in case No. 360/2367/16-k. URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/72850708 (in Ukrainian).
22. Resolution dated November 8, 2018 in case No. 489/3209/16-k. URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/7780139 (in Ukrainian).
23. Resolution of the CCC of the Supreme Court dated June 21, 2018 in case No. 748/1061/16-k. URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/74963670 (in Ukrainian).
24. Resolution of the Supreme Court of Appeals of Ukraine dated February 28, 2019 in case No. 330/2292/14-k. URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80304865 (in Ukrainian).
25. Resolution of the CCS of the Supreme Court of February 7, 2019 in case No. 332/1777/14-k URL: www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80017586 (in Ukrainian).
26. Review of the judicial practice of the Criminal Court of Cassation as part of the Supreme Court regarding the provision of the right to defense in criminal proceedings (cases). Kyiv, 2019. 36 p. (in Ukrainian).
27. Resolution of the Supreme Court of Appeals of Ukraine dated May 24, 2018 in case No. 332/2781/15-k. URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/74409389 (in Ukrainian).
28. Resolution of the CC of the Supreme Court of February 26, 2019 in case No. 734/117/15-k. URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80178614 (in Ukrainian).
29. Resolution of the Supreme Court of Appeals of Ukraine dated May 22, 2018 in case No. 740/1347/16-k. URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/74440195 (in Ukrainian).
30. Resolution of the SC of the Supreme Court of February 12, 2019 in case No. 754/4282/16-k URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/79883009 (in Ukrainian).
31. Resolution of the Supreme Court of Appeals of Ukraine dated February 6, 2018 in case No. 752/11464/16-k. URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/72150999 (in Ukrainian).
32. Resolution of the Supreme Court of Justice of Ukraine dated December 13, 2018 in case No. 760/17411/17. URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/78627281 (in Ukrainian).
33. Resolution of the Central Committee of the Supreme Court dated June 20. 2019 in case No. 607/12579/17-k. URL: reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/82636244 (in Ukrainian).
34. Bairachna L.K., Bondar T.I. Judicial discretion as a tool for ensuring the justice of the judiciary. Carpathian Legal Bulletin. No. 6. 2021. pp. 22-27. URL pyuv.onua.edu.ua/index.php/pyuv/article/view/960 (in Ukrainian).
35. Decision of the ECHR in the case "Ushakov and Ushakova v. Ukraine" (Ushakov and Ushakova v. Ukraine) dated June 18, 2015, application No. 10705/12. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_a89#Text (in Ukrainian).