Issue: № 11, 2021
Doi: https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2021.11.1
Introduction. The introduction of tax rating will help to centralize the control over the activities of economic entities by various government agencies. On the other hand, tax rating will avoid subjectivity in the assessment of enterprises by the tax authorities and establish a transparent and understandable work of the tax authorities themselves for taxpayers and society as a whole. The purpose of the paper consists in a thorough study and analysis of international and domestic experience in rating the economic activity of enterprises by tax indicators in Ukraine to develop harmonized and unified guidelines for ranking business entities in the European integration of Ukraine. Results. To determine the company's rating by tax indicators, it is necessary to assess the company's payment of taxes, fees and other tax payments and introduce digital rating of the company's fiscal indicators, which, thanks to two-way communication, will reveal negative phenomena in enterprises and fiscal authorities. When ranking enterprises by tax indicators, it will be possible to avoid the corruption component in the distribution of budget funds, the provision of tax benefits, to identify the most important industries, regions and enterprises that need state aid. Also with the help of this rating and tax indicators, you can calculate the amount by region, region, industry, which large enterprises (unfortunately, the state as well) hide. You can also determine the reduction of gross product due to the large salaries of “predatory” top management. We remind you that Ukraine has a flat scale of taxation of individuals and the main tax revenues under this article are paid by the poor and middle class. That is, in fact, the poor and middle class pay pensions, including to the rich. Comparing the paid taxes and own revenues of the region plus determining the amount of domestic debt with its sources of repayment will significantly strengthen financial and tax discipline both in the center and on the ground. Such measures will significantly improve Ukraine's international image and simplify its entry into the international community. Conclusions. The proposed guidelines for digital rating of tax indicators of enterprises will improve the regulatory framework for determining the rating of the enterprise to obtain a scale of reliability of the enterprise as a business entity, eliminate significant problems of corruption in the fiscal system, improve financial and tax discipline primarily in central authorities, and secondly in industries, oblasts, cities, etc. These recommendations make it possible to establish opportunities for honest enterprises to obtain various privileges from the state and to avoid unreasonable and often ineffective inspections by tax and other authorities.
Keywords : rating, criterion, indicator, tax rating
References:
1. Tax Code of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine of 02.12.2010 № 2755–VI. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. 2011, № 13–14, № 15–16, № 17, p. 112. (in Ukrainian).
2. Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses: Law of Ukraine of 07.12.2084 № 8073-Х. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of the Ukrainian SSR (VVR) 1984, appendix to № 51, Article 112. (in Ukrainian).
3. Criminal Code of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine of April 5, 2001 № 2341–III. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine.2001, № 25–26, art.131.4. On approval of the National Rating Scale: Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of April 26, 2007 № 665. Official Gazette of Ukraine. 2007. № 32. (in Ukrainian).
4. On approval of the National Rating Scale: Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of April 26, 2007 № 665. Official Gazette of Ukraine. 2007. № 32. P. 25. (in Ukrainian).
5. Everything you need to know about credit ratings. Standard & Poors Rating Services. McGRAW HILL FINANCIAL, 2014. URL: https://www.standardandpoors.com/en_EN/delegate/getPDF?articleId=1498030&type=COMMENTS&sub=RATING% 20DEFINITION (in Russian).
6. Socio-economic diagnostics in the conditions of globalization / O.Y. Kuzmin, et.al. Lviv: Lviv Polytechnic Publishing House, 2012. 284 p. (in Ukrainian).
7. Hryhoriev O.Yu., Petryshyn N.Ya., Todoshchuk A.V. Methodical recommendations for digital rating of enterprises. Economics. Finances. Law. 2020. № 12/4. pp. 5–8. (in Ukrainian).
8. Hryhoriev O.Yu., Petryshyn N.Ya., Todoshchuk A.V. Methodical recommendations for digital assessment of social indicators of enterprises. Economics. Finances. Law. 2021. № 4. pp. 10–15. (in Ukrainian).