Issue: № 6, 2025
Doi: https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2025.6.21
Introduction. The paper explores the legal framework and protection mechanisms concerning selected non-traditional objects of intellectual property in Ukraine: trade secrets, rationalization proposals, plant varieties, and scientific discoveries. These categories fall outside the conventional scope of patent or copyright protection and are regulated inconsistently. The purpose of the paper is to identify the key features and gaps in the regulation of non-traditional intellectual property objects and to substantiate the need for legal reform and harmonization with European Union standards. Results. It is demonstrated that the protection of trade secrets remains fragmented and lacks a unified legislative act, which creates legal uncertainty. Rationalization proposals are not subject to state registration and rely on internal recognition by enterprises, with authors having only limited rights. The legal regime of plant varieties is relatively developed, governed by a special law and a functioning patent system. In contrast, animal breeds are excluded from IP protection, and scientific discoveries are acknowledged solely as objects of personal non-property rights, without any operative registration mechanism. Comparative analysis with EU Directive 2016/943 on trade secrets highlights the necessity for harmonization. Conclusion. The study concludes that Ukraine’s legal system requires systematic improvements in the regulation of non-traditional IP objects. Adoption of targeted legislative acts, clarification of terminology, procedural guarantees, and the introduction of effective protection instruments are essential for strengthening innovation policy and ensuring legal certainty. Recommendations for law-making initiatives and integration of European legal approaches are outlined.
Keywords : intellectual property, non-traditional objects, trade secret, rationalization proposal, plant variety, scientific discovery, legal protection, rights enforcement, legislative harmonization
References:
1. Popova N.O. Protection of intellectual property rights to trade secrets in Ukraine and the European Union. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Law. 2025. Vol. 1, No. 88. pp. 388–393. URL: https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.88.1.56 [in Ukrainian].
2. On Information: Law of Ukraine of October 2, 1992, No. 2657-XII. Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. 1992. No. 48. Art. 650. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2657-12#Text (accessed: 15.06.2025) [in Ukrainian].
3. On Protection against Unfair Competition: Law of Ukraine of June 7, 1996, No. 236/96-VR. Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. 1996. No. 36. Art. 164. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/236/96-вр#Text [in Ukrainian].
4. Civil Code of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine of January 16, 2003, No. 435-IV. Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. 2003. Nos. 40–44. Art. 356. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text [in Ukrainian].
5. Poliarush S.I. Rationalization proposal: problems of protection and legal defense. Scientific Notes. Series: Law. 2022. No. 12. pp. 40–45. URL: https://doi.org/10.36550/2522-9230-2022-12-40-45 [in Ukrainian].
6. On the Protection of Rights to Plant Varieties: Law of Ukraine of April 21, 1993, No. 3116-XII. Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. 1993. No. 21. Art. 218. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3116-12#Text [in Ukrainian].
7. On the Protection of Rights to Inventions and Utility Models: Law of Ukraine of December 15, 1993, No. 3687-XII. Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. 1994. No. 7. Art. 32. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3687-12#Text [in Ukrainian].
8. Motriuk A.D. Protection of the right to scientific discovery as one of the main conditions for the development of science in Ukraine. Conference Materials of Sumy State University. URL: https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/bitstream-download/123456789/34115/1/Motruk_copyright.pdf [in Ukrainian].