Issue: № 6, 2025
Doi: https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2025.6.13
This paper explores the urgent issue of protecting cultural property during armed conflicts, with particular focus on the full-scale aggression against Ukraine. The research investigates the application of national and international criminal law to instances of destruction or damage to cultural heritage and evaluates the sufficiency of existing legal mechanisms. A detailed classification of such offenses is proposed, distinguishing between crimes resulting from direct military actions (e.g., missile strikes and artillery shelling) and those stemming from the inadequate preservation, looting, or improper restoration of cultural heritage by occupying forces. The paper also examines relevant international precedents, including legal responses to crimes against cultural property in Mali (Timbuktu), the former Yugoslavia, and Syria, demonstrating how international tribunals and institutions have addressed similar violations. Special attention is given to the necessity of compiling a specific and up-to-date register of cultural heritage sites under threat in Ukraine. This would serve as a basis for both targeted protection and timely diplomatic and legal response. The authors emphasize the critical role of international organizations not only in recording large-scale destruction caused by military aggression but also in monitoring the status of cultural heritage in temporarily occupied territories, where systemic neglect, unauthorized interventions, and illicit trafficking may lead to irreparable damage. In addition, the paper argues for improving Ukraine’s criminal legislation by clearly distinguishing crimes against cultural heritage from other war-related offenses, which would facilitate better legal qualification, statistical tracking, and international cooperation. Such reforms are necessary for Ukraine to fulfill its international obligations under The Hague Convention of 1954 and its Protocols, as well as other relevant instruments of international cultural protection law. Finally, the paper advocates for the establishment of stronger legal, institutional, and diplomatic frameworks to preserve and protect cultural values both in peacetime and during armed conflict, ensuring their survival for future generations.
Keywords : protection of cultural values, armed conflict, international case law
References:
1. Adewumi A.A. War time pains, all time pains: spoilage of cultural property in Mali. Art Antiquity & L. 2013. №18. URL: https://www.thefreelibrary.com/War+time+pains%2C+all+time+pains%3A+spoilage+of+cultural+property+in+Mali-a0361847935
2. Choudhury M.. Arimatsu L. Protecting Cultural Property in Non-International Armed Conflicts: Syria and Iraq. International law studies. 2015. Vol. 91. pp. 641-698. URL: https://www.academia.edu/100331433/Protecting_Cultural_Property_in_Non_International_Armed_Conflicts_Syria_and_Iraq
3. Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict with Regulations for the Execution of the Convention. The Hague, 14 May 1954. 25 p. URL: https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/1954_Convention_EN_2020.pdf
4. PROSECUTOR v. PAVLE STRUGAR: Judgement. International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Former Yugoslavia since 1991. IN TRIAL CHAMBER II. Case No. IT-01-42-T. January 31, 2005. URL: https://www.icty.org/x/cases/strugar/tjug/en/str-tj050131e.pdf
5. Prosecutor v. Tihomir Blaskic (Appeal Judgement), IT-95-14-A. International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). 29 July 2004. URL: https://www.refworld.org/cases,ICTY,4146f0eb4.html
6. Statement of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Fatou Bensouda, at the opening of the confirmation of charges hearing in the case against Mr Ahmad Al-Faqi Al Mahdi. International Criminal Court. 1 March 2016. URL: https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx?name=otp-stat-01-03-16
7. Війна Росії проти культурної спадщини України: Стислий огляд ДСЄП (Дослідницька служба Європейського парламенту). PE 729.377 – квітень 2022 р. URL: https://ukraine.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/250651/0133_1258078_EPRS-AaG-729377-Russias-war-Ukraine-cultural-heritage-FINAL-ForTrad.pdf
8. The Genoese Fortress in Sudak: the Period of Occupation. Materials from the online publication "Voice of Crimea", section "Culture" dated 21.09.2020. URL: https://culture.voicecrimea.com.ua/uk/henuezka-fortetsia-v-sudaku-period-okupatsii/
9. Second Protocol to the Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict 1954. The Hague, March 26, 1999 (Accession of Ukraine to the Second Protocol in accordance with Law No. 585-IX of 04/30/2020). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_001-99#Text
10. Kryvolapov B.M. Protection of Cultural Property during the Conflict in the South-East of Ukraine. Culture and Modernity. 2018. No. 1. pp. 274-278.
11. Cultural values of Crimea and Donbas in conditions of war and occupation: Materials of the Round Table “Historical, cultural and scientific potential of the South and East of Ukraine in conditions of occupation and military operations: threats, losses, prospects for preservation and restoration” (Kyiv, November 12, 2015). Kyiv, 2016. 90 p.
12. Direct hit on Derzhprom: what is the condition of the monument after the strike by Russian troops. Materials of the online publication “Suspilne. Kharkiv”. October 28, 2024. URL: https://suspilne.media/kharkiv/867899-prame-vlucanna-u-derzprom-v-akomu-stani-pamatka-pisla-udaru-rosijskih-vijsk/
13. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ratified with applications by Law No. 3909-IX of 21.08.2024). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_588#Text
14. Ukraine: UNESCO unites military, cultural and legal experts to protect cultural values. Official UNESCO portal in Ukraine. “News” section. August 12, 2024. URL: https://www.unesco.org/uk/articles/ukrayina-yunesko-obyednalo-viyskovykh-spetsialistiv-kultury-ta-fakhivtsiv-pravovoyi-systemy-dlya
15. Due to morning shelling in Kyiv, the Philharmonic and the Khanenko and Shevchenko museums were damaged: material from the information publication “Ukrainian Truth” dated October 10, 2022. URL: https://life.pravda.com.ua/culture/2022/10/10/250761/