Issue: № 8, 2023
Doi: https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2023.8.18
Introduction. The paper highlights and analyzes the concept of defamation under general legislation and sports law, features of interpretation, consideration of disputes and bringing to sports disciplinary responsibility by sports justice bodies. The purpose of the paper is to determine the specifics of defamation disputes in sports and the consideration of these cases in the bodies of sports justice. Results. It has been established that sports regulations regulate the institution of defamation by directly or indirectly prohibiting it. Sports regulation can manifest itself both through the prohibition of defamation and through obligations to show respect to colleagues, to protect the dignity of people and not to participate in any form of harassment or persecution. In most cases, actual defamation in sports leads to prosecution for harming the reputation of the sport or sports organization. Consideration of this category of disputes is carried out by quasi-arbitration bodies, which are formed by sports federations. During the consideration of disputes by the bodies of sports justice, the question arises whether defamatory judgments are evaluative and whether it is possible to bring disciplinary responsibility for such statements. As a result of the study, it was established that the right to freely express one's views and beliefs does not allow defamatory statements. Also, free expression of one's thoughts can simultaneously be a violation of sports regulations. Conclusion. Defamation in sports is the dissemination of information that does not correspond to reality and degrades the honor, dignity, business reputation of a natural person, business reputation of a legal entity or sports in general. A person may be subject to sports disciplinary responsibility even in the absence of a statement from the injured person, in particular, if such behavior is qualified as behavior that harms the reputation of the sport or the federation.
Keywords : sports law, defamation, evaluative judgments, business reputation, statements
References:
1. Luspenyk D.D. Institute of defamation and Ukrainian legislation on protection of honor, dignity and business reputation. Law of Ukraine. Kyiv, 2006. № 2. P. 62–65 (in Ukrainian).
2. Simon D. Defamation brief: Basic concepts of reputation protection law. Kyiv, 2008. 27 p. (in Ukrainian).
3. FIFA Code of Ethics Edition 2023. URL: https://digitalhub.fifa.com/m/4f048486c1f7293c/original/FIFA-Code-of-Ethics-2023.pdf
4. Code of Ethics and Fair Play of Ukrainian Association of Football dated 2018. URL: https://uaf.ua/files/Кодекс етики і чесної гри 2018.pdf (in Ukrainian).
5. Ethics Code of dated 2021. URL: https://uaf.org.ua/images/otherdocuments/Federation/Doc/etics-codecs.pdf(in Ukrainian).
6. Statute of Ukrainian Association of Football. URL: https://uaf.ua/files/Статут УАФ 2020.pdf (in Ukrainian).
7. Statute of Ukrainian Gymnastics Federation. URL: http://ukraine-rg.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/STATUT-FGU2013.pdf (in Ukrainian).
8. On judicial practice in cases of protection of the dignity and honor of an individual, as well as the business reputation of an individual and a legal entity: Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine dated 27 February 2009 №1. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v_001700-09#Text (in Ukrainian).
9. Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 4 November 1950. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#n289 (in Ukrainian).
10. Arbitration CAS 2012/A/3041 Irina Deleanu v. Federation Internationale de Gymnastique (FIG): CAS Arbitration Award of 12 June 2013. URL: https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared%20Documents/3041.pdf
11. Arbitration CAS 2007/A/1291 Mikhaylo Zubkov v. Fédération Internationale de Natation (FINA): CAS Arbitration Award of 21 December 2007. URL: https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared%20Documents/1291.pdf
12. Arbitration CAS 2008/A/1539 Nicholas D'Arcy v. Australian Olympic Committee (AOC). CAS Arbitration Award of 27 May 2008. URL: https://arbitrationlaw.com/sites/default/files/free_pdfs/CAS%202008-A1539%20 NDA%20v%20AOC%20Award.pdf
13. George P. Sport in Disrepute. Australian and New Zealand Sports Law Journal. 2009. No. 4(1). URL: http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ ANZSportsLawJl/2009/3.pdf
14. Kyseliova О.І. Peculiarities of disciplinary responsibility of professional athletes. Electronic scientific publication «Analytical and comparative jurisprudence». 2022. № 5. URL: http://journal-app.uzhnu.edu.ua/article/view/270238/265575 (in Ukrainian).
15. Disciplinary rules of Ukrainian Association of Football. URL: https://uaf.ua/files/biblioteka/referee/docs/Дисциплінарні правила УАФ.pdf (in Ukrainian).