Issue: № 7, 2023
Doi: https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2023.7.8
The purpose of the paper is to determine the place and features of judicial control over the activities of public administration among other types of state control. It has been established that control over the activities of public authorities includes the activities of legislative and executive bodies, their territorial bodies, state collegial bodies, local state administrations, local self-government bodies, the court and the prosecutor's office with regard to monitoring compliance with legal requirements (precepts, norms) and preventing their violations in the future Judicial control in this context acts as a special type of control in the activities of public authorities, the peculiarity of which is that it is not carried out on a permanent basis or systematically, such as control by specialized control bodies, but only in the process of considering administrative cases. Depending on the type of judicial jurisdiction, such types of judicial control were distinguished as general judicial control, or control carried out by general courts during the consideration of criminal, civil and administrative cases; specialized judicial control, or control carried out by specialized (administrative and economic) courts; constitutional judicial control, or control carried out by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine as the only body of constitutional jurisdiction. It was determined that the grounds for conducting judicial control over the activities of the public administration should be of a purely legal nature, i.e. checking the legality, the state of compliance with the rights and freedoms of citizens, etc. It has been established that today the creation of advanced forms of judicial control is a necessity arising from the objective needs of a civilized and democratic society. This type of control contributes to increasing the level of legal protection of citizens and serves as a criterion for assessing the legality of actions of state bodies.
Keywords : control, judicial control, public administration, court, activity of public administration, state authorities, justice
References:
1. Arato Ye. Revival, decline and reconstruction of civil society. Political opinion. 1996. №. 1. рр. 68-79 (in Ukrainian).
2. Averianov V.B. Public administration: problems of administrative and legal theory and practice. Kyiv, 2003. 384 р. (in Ukrainian).
3. Sushko L. The essence of judicial control in Ukraine. Law of Ukraine. 1997. №. 5. рр. 128-130. (in Ukrainian).
4. Administrative law of Ukraine / Yu.P. Bytiak et al. Kharkiv, 2004. 401 р. (in Ukrainian).
5. Kaidashev R.P. The essence of judicial control in the administrative process of Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of the Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs. 2015. №. 3. рр. 126-131. (in Ukrainian).
6. Bukhanevych O.M., Ivanovska A.M. Constitutional control as a type of state control: substantive and functional characteristics. Public law. 2019. №. 4 (36). рр. 9-18 (in Ukrainian).
7. Vasylieva O.I. Activities of state authorities and local self-government bodies in the field of providing administrative services as an object of control. Scientific Bulletin of the Academy of Municipal Management. Series: Management. 2014. №. 1. рр. 19-28. (in Ukrainian).
8. Hrytsenko O.I. Control and evaluation of managerial activity: reference synopsis of lectures. Kyiv, 2009. 108 р. (in Ukrainian).
9. Hudz B.D. Judicial control over the legality of administrative activities of executive authorities: diss. ... PhD in legal sciences: 12.00.07. Kyiv, 2013. 218 p. (in Ukrainian).
10. Sushko L.P.Organizational and legal principles of judicial control in Ukraine: diss. ... PhD in legal sciences: 12.00.07. Kyiv, 2009. 181 p. (in Ukrainian).