Algorithmization of judicial proceedings: the role of artificial intelligence at the stage of initiation of proceedings and preparation of cases for trial as a tool of procedural economy

№ 3, 2026

Authors: Hryhorii SOLOMON

Issue: № 3, 2026

Doi: https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2026.3.7

This paper explores the potential of applying artificial intelligence technologies at the initial stages of judicial proceedings - specifically during the initiation of a case and its preparation for trial - as an effective instrument for implementing the principle of procedural economy. The study examines how AI-driven tools can be used to automate the preliminary analysis of procedural documents, verify their compliance with formal legal requirements, and detect deficiencies, inconsistencies, or incomplete materials before a case is formally assigned to a judge. Such early-stage automation may significantly reduce the administrative burden on courts and help prevent delays caused by procedural errors. The paper substantiates the concept of AI-assisted case preparation, which includes the generation of structured analytical briefs, identification of applicable legal norms, retrieval and systematization of relevant case law, and preliminary identification of key legal issues that require judicial assessment. By supporting judges and court staff with high-quality analytical input, AI systems can enhance the efficiency and consistency of judicial workflows while preserving the human-centered nature of adjudication. Special attention is given to the ethical and legal boundaries of algorithmizing judicial procedures. The research addresses concerns related to the preservation of judicial independence, transparency of algorithmic decision-making, data protection, and the parties’ right to a fair trial. The paper emphasizes that artificial intelligence should function exclusively as a decision-support tool rather than a substitute for judicial discretion. Based on the conducted analysis, practical recommendations are formulated regarding the gradual implementation of AI instruments within the Ukrainian judicial system, taking into account the specific features of national electronic document management, existing procedural legislation, and institutional capacity. The proposed approach aims to balance technological innovation with fundamental principles of justice, legality, and trust in the judiciary.

Keywords : artificial intelligence, judicial proceedings, initiation of proceedings, preparation of a case for trial, procedural economy, electronic document management, automation of judicial proceedings, Legal Tech, digital justice, algorithmization of judicial procedures

References:

1. Ashley K.D. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics: New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age. Cambridge, 2017. 450 p.

2. Pasquale F. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Cambridge, 2015. 320 p.

3. Surden H. Machine learning and law. Washington Law Review. 2014. Vol. 89. pp. 87–115.

4. Susskind R. Tomorrow’s Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future. Oxford, 2017. 240 p.

5. Susskind R. Online Courts and the Future of Justice. Oxford, 2019. 368 p.

6. Maliarenko V.T. Courts, Law Enforcement and Human Rights Protection Bodies of Ukraine. Kyiv:, 2020. 512 p. (in Ukrainian).

7. Stepanova, T. V. Principles of Civil Procedural Law: Monograph. Odesa, 2018. 248 p. (in Ukrainian).

8. Shtefan M.Y. Civil Procedural Law of Ukraine. Kyiv, 2005. 624 p. (in Ukrainian).

9. Yasynok M.M. The principle of procedural economy in civil proceedings. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law. 2019. No. 5. pp. 58–62. (in Ukrainian).

10. Katz D.M., Bommarito M.J. Predicting the behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States. PLoS ONE. 2017. Vol. 12(4).

11. Remus D., Levy F. Can robots be lawyers? Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics. 2017. Vol. 30. pp. 501–558.